I went and researched a little bit more into this subject, and on many of the web pages there are equally hot and cold comments left by others; some saying that since its an entirely new story with similarities to "Catcher", there should be no reason why a federal judge would rule to ban the US publication of the book since, according to some, it is merely a derrivative work. For others, for example a blogger on another website who was responding to a different article on the same subject, said people think "that only verbatim copying can constitute "copying" for purposes of an infringement/fair use analysis. This is simply not the case. There are two forms of similarity that are relevant - "fragmented literal similarity" (actual copying) and "comprehensive non-literal similarity." If you take enough of another person's work, even if it isn't literal expression, it can rise to the level of actionable copying." This is not to say that any work cannot be influenced by another work, however respectable dues have to be credited for an author's original work. And while there are certain people who would say that Mr. California doesn't copy word for word Mr. Salinger's work, it does seem he wants to exploit the value of Holden Caulfield by Salinger and has not been sufficiently transformative of his story to claim fair use.


My favorite response concerning copyright law was from some guy who wrote:

"There goes my trilogy book deal, Duke of the Bracelets, about Freddo Baggets' journey to destroy his "one bracelet to govern them all", on the Isle of Martyr where the silhouttes lie."